by shaun lawton
that is bring around,
or establish, win over,
demonstrate and make
a believer out of someone,
that crime does not pay;
that wickedness and mis-
conduct does not allow
remuneration or ultim-
ate satisfaction in the
grander scheme of
things; and who
is to say, one way
or the other, that the
tension fraught between
the two opposing forces of
good and evil isn't somehow
a natural amperage, who's to
declare these integral, inter-
locked stimuli remain in
constant opposition after
all, if their cohabitation
provides the essence
of the whole? If the
paradox of truth may
lead to madness,
then can the certainty
of misrepresentation
potentially lead to a
balanced sense
of sanity?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Anything you say here is virtually impossible. You must write it in a language the computer understands. If it's not Spanish or English, I'll copy and paste it into google translate. If you're a robot and managed to get past the Captcha, good for you. As long as you're an interesting robot or nice one, you can stay. But if you exhibit any of the traits of certain online trolls who pimp sunglasses (for instance) you are not welcome here regardless of your sex or species.